In a high-risk testimony, wobbly Moller seemed uncertain because the Democrats and Republicans were full of questions about the investigation and repeatedly asked lawmakers to reiterate their question or reaffirm their question.

The former head of the FBI, 74, and the experienced attorney general repeatedly sent legislators to the report, saying he would not go too far in his long-awaited appearances before two House of Representatives committees headed by Democrats.

But his answers made it clear that he was opposed to Trump’s claim that the April report had taken away charges of obstructing justice.

“The result suggests that the president has not been acquitted of the alleged acts,” Muller told the Judicial Committee of the House of Representatives.

The former special adviser stressed that Russia intervened in the 2016 elections and did so to reinforce Trump’s campaign against his rival, Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, unlike Trump’s repeated denials.

But he also said that the president or other activist had not been accused of cooperating with the Russians because the investigation lacked sufficient support for conspiracy charges.

“We did not find sufficient evidence of the president’s guilt,” he told the commission.

There is not much new information.
In his first appearance on the hill, Muller offered little support for the initial democratic efforts to launch an attempt to isolate Trump.

Mueller, who enjoyed a solid reputation in direct shooting and personal integrity, seemed old and unstable, as he was receiving questions for the first time since the closure was achieved.

Much of American public opinion remains unclear about its conclusion about whether Trump is criminally challenging justice and if his campaign is in collusion with the Russians.

His 448-page report contains an extensive catalog of communications between Trump and the Russians, which includes attempts at collaboration or complicity, none of which is a specific crime.

Scroll down to read a summary of Mueller’s report

The report also details 10 cases when Trump allegedly tried to obstruct the investigation.

But Muller said he could not recommend charges against Trump because the rules of the Department of Justice prevented him from filing criminal charges against the current president.

Reject Trump’s accusation.
In their interrogation, the Democrats detailed several cases of the report, since Trump’s actions in 2017, including the attempt to dismiss Muller himself, met the criteria to obstruct justice.

While the former FBI chief agreed to describe his behavior, he repeatedly resisted the pressure to say the president had obstructed.

“The president cannot be charged with a crime,” Muller told the committee citing the rules of the Department of Justice.

Democratic lawmakers are disappointed that he “does not necessarily agree” with the conclusion about the blockade of the presidency they were referring to.

Moller’s optimism and difficult responses can thwart the efforts of Democrats to strengthen Trump’s policy / policy.

In addition, Müller’s own image as a hardened public prosecutor suffered, as he did not seem to recall some parts of the investigation and details in the huge report.

“I will leave the answer to our report,” he said several times.

“I’m not aware of that,” he told lawmakers who asked for details.

“It’s a delicate thing to say,” said David Axelrod, a Democratic strategist. “But Muller, whom I respect a lot, has not seen publicly before Congress for at least six years.”

Trump, since 2017, seems to have described Muller’s investigation as a politically motivated witch hunt that seemed to be following the White House special session on Wednesday despite previous statements he would not see the broadcast.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *